|
|
Deconstructing the Woman's Pie Chart
Now
this is a fairly accurate description, and is essentially accurate.
It misses a number of fine points. By defining the 40% block as "looks"
the theory had originally assumed that looks were influenced by factor's
other than just phyical attraction. For example, a guy who is a complete
asshole to a woman seems to somehow look better to them. It soon became
apparent from peer review that the term looks was inappropriate and
has been replaced by the more accurate "attraction". The new
chart then looks like this. Previously
it had been assumed that looks was fundamental. That is, that it could
not be broken down any further, and that a score was assigned based
on whatever biological principles made women attracted to men. Through
extensive research we have been able to discern the inner structure
of attraction. A chart will illustrate a very close approximation of
the inner structure of attraction for the female. Commentary to follow. Physical Attraction/Looks - This is still a big factor in attraction. This is self-explanatory. Competition - I almost titled this section disinterest. The two are closely related. We can only pursue what runs away from us. A man who is devoted to something else besides the woman is automatically more attractive. Any intellectual whore who has ever listened to a girl complain about how her boyfriend-ran-off-with-a-slut or how her boyfriend-is-really-not-dumb-he's-just-streetsmart-and-he- has-to-sell-weed-to-support-his-baby's-mama or he's-really-nice-even-though-he-ignores-me-and-hits-me-sometimes-but-you-don't- know-what-he's-like-when-we're-alone or he's-not-emotionally-available-that's-why-I-like-talk-to-you-until-it's-time-to-go-fuck-him while he himself is sitting right there and would like nothing better than to be with her but of course is sitting solidly on the friends ladder knows this intuitively. Ultimately, almost all guys learn this truth for themselves: The best way to never score with a woman is to show too much interest in her. Women seem to especially like it if you are more devoted to your bad music, biker gang, forearm tattoo or marijuana. These all seem to work wonders. There are some interests you can show in a woman that will help you to fuck her: a healthy interest in destroying her self-esteem and in fucking her friends more than her seem to work wonders. Note that the following topics of disinterest have been field tested and shown conclusively not to work: Unix, literature, poetry, international politics, and sodomy. Novelty
- Let's face it, if you're like every other guy who works a normal job
and tries to live a good life, you're probably like just about every
other guy. Chicks don't dig this, and why would they? Who wants someone
who is just like everyone else? Something different is more attractive.
Like someone who does not have to work during the day like most people
because they have lots of money from business or selling drugs. Or like
someone who has stabbed a man and went to prison for it. Different is
a veritable ticket to getting laid. "Power
is a great aphrodesiac" - Notorious Asshole and War Criminal Henry
Kissinger It was
previously assumed that money was a fundamental unit of attraction to
a woman. Further investigation has revealed a better understanding of
this very important piece of the woman's rating system. The piece which
was formerly labelled money has been replaced by a money/power paradigm.
The two are almost always intertwined in a way that makes them hard
to distinguish, so I don't think it productive to make a chart of how
they breakdown exactly. One almost always follows the other in any case. What
is important to know about the money/power piece is that previously
it was thought of as static. Now we know that the money/power piece
of attraction displays time-variance. That is, the amount of money needed
to get maximal "points" in the money category varies according
to the age of the woman. When a woman is younger her perspective is
different as to what makes a lot of money. As she gets older the amount
of money neccessary for full points increases. At no point
that we can discern does money ever not become a factor. Take any guy.
Take a woman that has that guy. In no circumstance that is known would
she not rather have a guy just like that, but with more money. Actually,
maybe in one circumstance -- when the guy has enough money to buy her
basically everything she wants. This is self-evident, I should think. I think
is very very close to a final analysis of how a woman's rating system
works. If you are very attractive, rich, and novel and show no interest
in her she is almost guaranteed to want to fuck you. Indeed, isn't this
the very definition of Alpha Male? In this way we have derived from
our theoretical framework an idea that agrees with observation and experiment
to many degrees of accuracy. It also provides a framework for the Logic.
Strive to be attractive, novel and aloof and you will go far. |
 |
 |
